It is time to salute the Hyderabad police because they have achieved such a feat that has brought solace to agitated minds of the people.
What did they do?
They succeeded in stopping the accused from escaping the clutches of law before gunning them down.
People celebrated, showered flowers on the police, distributed sweets and appeared on television saying this is cent per cent justice and the suspects deserved such a death.
Moreover, parents of Disha expressed gratitude towards police for encountering the suspects.
The encounter carried out by Cyberabad Commissioner VC Sajjanar's team has walked into the pages of history.
The police had arrested four accused on November 29, within 36 hours of committing the rape and murder. They were produced before a magistrate on November 30 and were remanded to 14-day judicial custody on the same evening.
On November 6, the four accused were killed when they were taken to Chatanpally to recover the phone, wallet and power bank of Disha. Her burnt body was found close to the spot of the reported encounter near the underpass of Shadnagar Outer Ring Road on November 27.
First Main Argument
AS soon as news of the encounter spread across India, the left-liberal cabal and urban naxals, who fight for human rights of criminals and terrorists, were shaken to the roots.
They started to use the old jargons of cold-blooded murder, an extra-judicial and uncivilized killing of the accused.
Wow! Just few days before the encounter, they were demanding speedy justice for Disha's family. When justice has been served, they are raising questions on the genuineness of the encounter.
They are asking what was the necessity for the police to take the suspects at the crime scene at 3 am in the morning?
This simply is an abnormal question. It is not wise to take the accused to the crime spot in day time when there was a growing outrage mounting across India over the incident. Thousands were protesting across India and family members turning away visiting politicians and police officials, demanding action instead.
Under these circumstances, there could have been breakdown of law and order. Few rubble-rousers, among the public, could have created a chaos and attacked the police or the accused. The attack on Rajesh Talwar, father of murdered teenager Aarushi Talwar, inside Ghaziabad court premises, is still fresh in our mind. Hence, this argument is useless and weak.
Second Main Argument
Around 2 am in the morning, the police left for the crime scene and reached the site where the victim was burnt around 3 am. There, the police asked the accused the whereabouts of Disha's mobile phone and other objects. Around 3.15 am, the police recovered the mobile phone and other objects. What this means?
This means that the accused were guilty of the crime because they exactly showed the police where the mobile phone and other objects were. If they were not accused persons, they would not have shown the exact site where the material were abandoned or buried?
Third Main Argument
After recovering the objects, the accused indulged in arguments with police and attempted to flee before creating a scene. They snatched two guns from policemen and pelted stones at them, due to which two policemen received serious head injuries.
In retaliation, the police resorted to firing from a distance of 50 meters surrounded by bushes and trees in pitch darkness for 10 to 15 minutes. In the cross-fire, the accused were gunned down.
Reacting to it, CPI leader D Raja's wife questioned the police for not firing on the lower part of accused bodies to fell them and avoid their abscondence.
Wow, what an argument!
Is it possible for the police to see the parts of the bodies of the fleeing persons in pitch darkness?
If she is a stickler to the police manuals for using firearm, isn't it her duty to wait for the report of the investigating team?
Raising such arguments without any clinching facts, is not good for society. If she is an activist, then she should also have the courtesy to respect the sentiments of the people.
Fourth Main Argument
Another gentleman is John Dayal, who is famous for his anti-India stance. He said the encounter is state-sponsored murder. If he has clinching facts to establish the proof of state-sponsored murder, he should lay it before the people.
Without any such facts laid in public, it is mere anti-state narrative with a nefarious agenda.
Amidst all this, a very good statement came from Nirbhaya's mother, who expressed her frustration of not getting justice even after the crime was committed seven years back. This delay in justice, is but natural for the people to vent their anger against the system and clamor for speedy justice.
And if Hyderabad encounter happens under these circumstances, people have no other choice, but to celebrate and call it a divine justice.
These human right activists and left-liberal cabal should understand rape is not only murder of the body, but also soul.
If there is harsher punishments than capital punishment, it must be awarded, without any delay. Period.
No comments:
Post a Comment